Statsman wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 3:44 pm
And she keeps getting away with it. I'm ever more of the opinion that she will win and be a disaster.
I'm not sure...
Once the mantle of the Presidency is thrown around her she'll probably pull in her horns (
mixed metaphor there)
She'll might develop a taste for the luxury and the expenses and the champagne receptions---like a nun released from the spartan regime of the cloister, who then wins the lotto...
Or alternatively, she might shop in Lidl and be photographed sweeping the entrance hall of the Aras to show how power hasn't corrupted her. That might be the extent of her rebellion
Once in office, she'll meet who she's told to meet, and go through the motions
As for her public statements when she's President.....Well, Michael D has shown everyone what you can get away with, and how elastic is the concept of a non-political Presidency
Michael D made veiled criticism of government policy, calling the housing crisis a "disaster" and "our great, great failure". Once upon a time that would have been a big deal, but it is what we expect from Michael D
Conolly will be in the same mould, I imagine
A lot of her Presidency will be visiting deprived communities, saying how shocking deprivation is, how something must be done to end deprivation , then playing a few more "keepie-uppies" with the kids in the flats...
On foreign policy she will be watched closely. She will be easier to rein in than Michael D, I think..