Bubblypop wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 12:44 pm
The ABCs of the CPI: How the Corruption… - Transparency.org 
https://share.google/CFViroEAhjlyjGKvT
If Ireland has enacted legislation to combat corruption, it stands to reason that corruption is not widespread nor excused. Which means being in the top ten of least corrupt countries is very easy.
 
Not sure I'd be comfortable with who is compiling the statistics, Bankers and Economists? That's likely to be as acceptable as a referendum in Russia.
We live in a country where top policemen, judges, lawyers, planners, bankers, civil servants etc, etc are all beholden to government for their very existence, who among these is ready to rock the boat when they see corruption. Ireland enacted corruption legislation in the face of public anger but again if the corruption is within the ranks of those bodies I listed, who will tell?
We had a case a couple of years ago where a top civil servant awarded himself an €80,000 pa salary increase, 80,000? double the average salary, as an increase? This same person was able to refuse to appear before the PAC, the government could, or maybe would, do nothing. Is this corruption? I think so because he should not be in that position. In Ireland the people are Sovereign, why then was this person in a position where he didn't have to answer to the people, in the form of the PAC, why is anybody for that matter.
We had a similar position in regards to a judge, whose decisions were becoming increasingly bizarre. The government couldn't remove him an that is understandable but still needs to be addressed, but the President of the High Court, couldn't sanction him in any way. Is this corruption? I think so.
So whereas the monetary and economics people may not think there is corruption in Ireland, they are judging it in monetary terms and by their own questionable standards. The corruption in Ireland is in the Establishment and its lackeys. Where is the redress scheme for all the victims of the RC Church, why aren't Bishops, Heads of Orders  etc in the dock accounting for their charges? Why was a government minister allowed to set a cap on the compensation the Church would have to pay of €128m when the scheme is likely to cost the taxpayer $1.5 billion? is this corruption? I think so.
Will the bankers and economists have taken these things into account?
Being offended doesn't automatically mean you are right.